Adviser of Self-management : The areas of self-administration are not as Aleppo, Daraa , and power of attorney of Turks to fight terrorism has nothing to do with the truth
We conducted a dialogue with the advisor of the Democratic Self-Government in Roj Ava and northern Syria “Badran Gia Kord” During which he spoke to the subject of the decision of the US withdrawal sudden,He also discussed the issue of talks with the Russians And finding a consensual meeting with the Syrian regime to prevent possible attacks “Turkish” on Syrian territory.
In response to the disclosure of the US administration, led by Trump whom he entrusted a fighting in Syria to Erdogan “Turkey”, ” And the question is where is the Da’ash even fought by Turkey ?? “This statement and this power of attorney does not have any relation to the truth. Turkey can not fight terrorism because it is the source of terrorism since the beginning of the Syrian crisis. Which has fed all terrorist groups materially and morally,There is no evidence that Turkey will fight terrorism, and all there may be a US plan to bring Turkey to its approach to keep it away from the Russian embrace, We do not think that Turkey will lead a fierce battle against terrorism. “And on their proposal for a road map to Moscow and the question whether the consultations continue ?? , Jia disclosed their contact with the Russian side, declaring “Yes, there is still contact with the Russian side as it was put forward during our meetings in Moscow,Now Russia is doing what was proposed in consultation and discussion with Damascus,And after the results of his contacts and discussions with Damascus, there could be other meetings and we are waiting for a response from the Russian side on what we put forward at those meetings.
And on how will the fate of the region in case the regime returned ?? And how will his return ?? Jia stressed that “The regime can not return from what it was before, for many reasons, first of all, there is a situation on the ground in the north and east of Syria, the existence of self-administration in these areas and what the administration has of the institutions and forces of security and military, All these data indicate that the regime can not return with all its institutions and enter the region without any negotiation, dialogue or agreement. This is an important point that we must focus on, Because these areas provided more than 8000 martyrs, so that it was able to maintain security and stability and liberate many areas of terrorism, And this process itself is a gain of the components and peoples of these regions, so the components of these regions can not accept the return of the system without political understanding or political agreement there must be an agreement and this is the essence of dialogue, Therefore, it is impossible to conceive, as envisaged by the regime in Damascus, where they imagine as they entered the areas of Daraa, Suwayda, Aleppo, Damascus and Aleppo with all their institutions and impose their control over it without any understanding only of what they called the return of all areas to the homeland, Through the processes of national reconciliation, we say these areas do not resemble those areas and can not pass the process of national reconciliation on the areas of self-management can not be accepted, The region has specificities, components, administrations and control forces on the ground, so there must be an understanding and a political agreement in this regard. ”
And the statements of the recent American officials and the issuance of permits consistent with the Kurdish feeling as reassuring messages, and the question whether they regret the statements Trump ?? Or is there something else ?? Description of Jia Kord that “These statements do not necessarily indicate a concern in the policy pursued by US President Donald Trump because they also said recently that they still support Trump’s position in the withdrawal, But disagreed on the mechanism of withdrawal and how to be the withdrawal, and said that the withdrawal will be slow and will have a timeline and did not withdraw only while achieving results for them is to end the organization “Da’ash” and protection of the Kurdish allies in the first place, Of course, these statements stem from the discussions that took place in the corridors of the US administration, There were opponents of the immediate and sudden withdrawal of US forces in the region, Because they believed that an immediate and rapid withdrawal would lead to the collapse of US strategy in the region and would undermine the efforts made in the fight against terrorism, All these issues will harm America’s strategy in the region, so they rethink the process or the mechanism of withdrawal, that is, a well thought out plan for the withdrawal process and did not specify any period of time for withdrawal, It may take years or months for there to be no withdrawal from the region, but they are determined to pursue their strategy of maintaining stability and security in the region, And in this point will try to find a situation of compatibility also with the Turks, because the statements were consistent with the wishes of the Turkish state, Turkey is the first to welcome the US withdrawal from Syria, And the idea of Turkey that it will fill that vacuum after the withdrawal and will eliminate the self-management and institutions in these areas, But this matter was not in favor of US interests in the region, and now is considering plans we have no knowledge of. These plans on the table are discussed with the Turks, Today there were meetings with Bolton and the Turkish administration, and we do not know exactly what happened, And we will look at it in the future and we will ask what is the thrust of those discussions and what plans are discussed with the Turkish side, Will these plans be a guarantor of the existence of self-management and its institutions and whether these plans will deter Turkish attacks and threats to the region, All these issues will be understood in the future by the US administration. ”
The Democratic Self-Government Advisor, Badran Jia Kord, also pointed to a contradiction between the new statements of Bolton and Erdogan, Bolton says Erdogan has vowed not to attack Kurdish forces while Erdogan describes Bolton’s mistakes by mistake ??”We do not believe that Turkey or Erdogan will undertake to protect the Kurds, this is far from the fact that Turkey, first and foremost Erdogan has a plan and strategy aimed primarily at the liquidation of the Kurds and the liquidation of the participatory situation in the region, This experience has existed for 8 years. This is far from the fact that the Turkish regime is based on the liquidation of these gains and this administration. Erdogan believes that the existence of this administration And this entity in the north and east of Syria will end the AKP so there is nothing to the truth by those statements, We must first understand that the Turkish presence or Turkish policy is becoming a greater threat than a self-promotion The region and the political solution and the security and stability of the region, And everyone should appear firm and decisive attitudes towards the Turkish politicians in the region, and if no decisive positions are seen in this direction, especially by the US or even Russian, Turkey will expand more and expand more and will attack more on the interests not only the Kurds But it will harm all the interests of the countries that are working together in Syria to fight terrorism or are working efforts to find a political solution in Syria. “